The following
transcript is reprinted with the permission of,
Ann Fischer, Exec.
SYSOP
COMPUSERVE
UFO FORUM
(EDITED BY JOHN
VELEZ)
IMPLANT OWNERSHIP: PROPOSAL AND SUMMARY
by Katharina Wilson c 1996
"Implants: Who do they
belong to? You might be surprised!"
The following Summary resulted from
a proposal that Peter Davenport asked me to write and post to fellow
abductees, writer-researchers, and investigators. The original
proposal was e-mailed and posted in June of 1996, and the Summary
follows.
PROPOSAL
Peter Davenport, the Director of The National UFO Reporting
Center, recently attended the 'UFO Expo West' Conference. During the
Q&A, after Whitley Strieber's presentation on Sunday, Peter made
the following proposal:
"Ufologists should establish a precedent at this time regarding
the ownership and possession of removed implants." Peter pointed out
that he believed that any FOREIGN BODY (as opposed to a tissue
sample) removed from a person should remain the property of that
individual.
"The crowd spontaneously broke out in applause and even Whitley
embraced the proposal strongly and immediately." Peter spoke briefly
with a representative of another group working with implants and he
was left with the impression that this researcher did not support the
proposal.
QUESTION: What do you believe the guidelines should be
concerning the foreign object, i.e. implant? Do you believe that
after the analysis is completed, the implant - object should be
returned to the abductee from whom it was taken? This is a variable
that we may not have thoroughly considered. Peter asked me to share
this proposal with others in the research - abductee - experiencer
community. If you have the time to participate in a dialogue about
this important proposal, please let your voices be heard.
Also, please consider this question if you are thinking about
having a FOREIGN OBJECT you believe to be an implant removed from
your body. Your ideas and feelings about this would be appreciated.
Please respond to Peter Davenport at ufocntr@nwlink.com.
[FYI: Katharina is the author of "The Alien Jigsaw" and "The
Alien Jigsaw Researcher's Supplement." Two books that chronicle the
first 32 years of her life and her experiences with non-human
Beings.] Thank you. <end>
SUMMARY
This proposal was originally e-mailed to four UFO researchers
who regularly lecture about UFOs, alien abductions, or both; five
MUFON investigators in the northwest, two UFO journalists, nine
abductees; four of whom are authors of books about the UFO or
abduction phenomenon, and three individuals who have expressed a deep
interest in the UFO phenomenon. In addition, two postings were made
to ISCNI message boards ("The Institute for the Study of Contact with
Non-Human Intelligence"), and one to an "OMNI" Magazine UFO/abduction
message board, both on America On-line.
RESPONSES
Curiously, none of the UFO researcher-lecturers responded, only
one MUFON investigator responded, and none of the three individuals
who have a deep interest in the UFO phenomenon responded. One of the
two UFO journalists responded, all four of the abductee/authors
responded, while only two of the remaining abductees responded. The
other responses came from the ISCNI message board area. I did not
include a response, and I received no responses from the "OMNI" site.
The total respondents from the implant proposal after ten days
numbered thirteen. After ten days, a second series of postings
were
made by Rebecca Schatte to Compuserve and other BBS sites, and
another twelve responses came in.
A few people made very short statements about the proposal,
while most sent in several pages of comments. I believe it would be
of interest to our readers to share some of the comments and concerns
that were relayed by the respondents.
From the total 25 respondents, it was generally agreed upon by
fifteen people that unless the abductee gives someone explicit
permission, no one else has the right to claim ownership of an object
removed from their body except the abductee. The remaining ten people
did not disagree with the question posed in the proposal. However,
rather than directly addressing the question, they elected to express
their concerns relating to the implant retrieval process in general.
These concerns will be addressed at this time.
Two respondents brought up the subject of selling implants for
monetary gain. One mentioned the selling of an alien implant in a
neutral manner, the other respondent believed that if anyone is to
make money from these implants, then it should be the abductee.
However, this person also expressed great distress that this would
ever be considered by anyone, especially an abductee or an abduction
researcher.
Another individual proposed that if someone else pays for the
removal of the object or if there is a third party involved, for
example, an insurance company, then that third party should have a
voice in the ultimate ownership of the object.
QUESTIONS FROM ABDUCTEES:
"Since established professionals of various professions are
being suspected of possible conspiracies and cover-ups, who would
want them to have possession of something so important?"
[Referring to alien implants.]
"How can we trust anyone but ourselves when it comes to
something so important [as an alien implant]?"
One respondent brought up the fact that implants may one day be
"seized by government and military personnel under some 'national
security' nonsense, or at least as a PR effort." This is a chilling
thought indeed, and I believe, not as far-fetched as you might
imagine.
PERSONAL INSIGHT
One respondent stated that the implant should be the property
of "the whole of humanity if it turns out to have value in furthering
our knowledge..." This same individual who did, in fact, have an
object removed from their body, recommended that abductees not take
this step until "[they] have thought long and hard" and they
"have defined [their] motives for doing so." It is noteworthy
to share this individual's insight with our readers: "...If it is
indeed a 'genuine article' you just may be in for a few surprises and
changes in your personal makeup that you had not counted on." This
person expressed that they had to come to terms with physiological
and psychological
changes they did not expect to occur after the object's removal.
It has been hypothesized by several people including myself,
that these devices may be altering our bodies either physiologically,
psychologically, and perhaps even psychically. Therefore, it would
seem that these implants probably have functions other than being a
device implanted merely for the purposes of tracking the
abductee.
SAFE TO REMOVE?
There was concern expressed by several respondents that having
an alien device removed from an abductee's body may not be such a
safe decision, since we know next to nothing about these objects.
Concern that the devices may be "booby-trapped," or "connected to
nerve endings," or that we might face the possibility of having
"...our very first fatality during a removal operation..." were some
of the concerns expressed. In addition, it was also suggested that a
"moratorium [be] placed on further surgeries until we have
the results [of] the first ten or twelve
[objects]."
Considering the words of the abductee who has already had one
of these objects removed, I think many people would agree that
further implant removal surgeries should be put on hold until there
is time to monitor the abductees for physiological and/or
psychological changes, and until the laboratory analysis has been
published in a reputable journal.
Interestingly, a researcher and author who responded to the
proposal stated that if abductees are not frightened by "propaganda,"
they probably won't elect to have their implants removed and that
"the standard reaction is a feeling of being intrigued by the
device's presence."
SCIENTIFIC ANALYSIS
Four individuals specifically questioned the validity of the
research results if the implant were returned to the abductee after
the original analysis was performed. Should the need to reexamine the
implant arise at some point in the future and the abductee retained
possession of the implant, they believed future results might be
inadvertently adulterated due to the inconsistent storage and
handling by the abductee.
Another important question that was brought up in this
discussion is: What if the abductee does not wish to remain in
possession of the implant? Another respondent stated that "an
honorable and respected group" of individuals should be in charge of
caring for, or archiving and storing the implants. It is interesting
to note that this "honorable and respected group" of people that
would care for these suspected alien devices did not have to include
anyone from the UFO - abduction community.
Care and respect for abductees' physical and mental well-being
and the object's 'chain of custody' are of primary concern to this
author. I am happy to report that several respondents brought up
these same concerns.
I have compiled the following list of considerations thanks to
the
suggestions from our respondents. The majority of these ideas come
from two scientists who asked not to be identified. My comments are
contained in brackets.
IMPORTANT CONSIDERATIONS
* Collect the objects and all possible information about their
sources.
* Decide on the best method(s) of analysis, preferably
non-destructive analysis that changes the objects as little as
possible.
* Preserve the objects in a way that keeps them available for
future study.
* One danger of allowing the objects to be returned to the
source is that some of them may be hoaxes. If the objects are not
available for future study, the data will be of no value and a new
investigation will have to be initiated. [Imagine how frustrating
this would be if you were the person who submitted yourself to
surgery in the interest of furthering scientific knowledge and your
data had to be omitted.]
* Everything stands the chance of being called a hoax by
'someone,' sooner or later. It is much more difficult to prove that a
genuine object is not a hoax when it has been accused of being one,
than it is to prove that something is not genuine.
* The same elements exist throughout the universe and their
physical reactions are the same, so we are not likely to find any
chemical compounds we couldn't find on Earth. [Recently,
astronomers discovered the 'building blocks' of vinegar in space.
Proving that something is an alien device by proving it is composed
of elements not found on Earth would be like asking us to use reverse
'debunker type' logic and state that salad dressing is an alien
creation!]
* [If you are an abductee and you know or suspect you have
an alien implant or a suspected foreign object in your body, do not
let your fear of the unknown or the requests of a researcher pressure
you into making a snap decision to have it removed. There is the
possibility that the object has been in your body for a long time and
another week or even a month probably will not make that much
difference.]
* A wealth of valuable data could be rendered meaningless
unless a methodology is set up for comparing, testing, and re-testing
these suspicious objects. [After the welfare of the
patient-abductee, the chain of custody is of the highest
importance.]
PUBLISH RESULTS
The belief in abductions aside, by the implementation of the
scientific method, (having the object removed by a qualified
physician and following the chain of custody precisely), there is no
reason why the results of an analysis of these objects should not be
submitted to a scientific journal for publication. I appeal to all
researchers and medical doctors involved in this endeavor: please let
one of your goals in performing this research to be the publication
your findings. Only by publishing your findings will the information
reach the public in a way that is verifiable by scientific
standards.
THANKS
I would like to sincerely thank everyone who took the time to
respond to this proposal. I am certain that all of our ideas and
opinions contributed to one another's awareness about the issues
abductees and the research community must eventually face. I
encourage you to continue expressing your ideas and views about this
important subject on message boards, in discussion groups, at
conferences, and to your personal physician should you find yourself
in the position of having one of these suspicious objects
removed.
If you have comments or questions, I can be reached at the
addresses listed below.
Thank
you,
Katharina
Wilson
Puzzle Publishing
P.O. Box 230023
Portland, OR 97281
The Alien Jigsaw
http://www.alienjigsaw.com
[Copyright ©1993-1998
Katharina Wilson. All Rights Reserved.Puzzle Publishing, PO Box
230023, Portland, Oregon, 97281-0023, USA. This article is reproduced
with permission of the Author. It is forbidden to post any of the
materials contained on this site to any newsgroup, website, or any
other electronic medium. Permission is granted to reproduce this
information in printed form, for personal, non-commercial purposes
only, provided the information and the copy, including the copyright
statement, remain intact and unedited.]
Contact the webmaster
John@virtuallystrange.net
BACK
TO P.O.V. PAGE